Who belongs to Defence?

Who belongs to Defence?

Applications were down 33%. University completion rates had fallen 22%. Competition from big tech and private industry was intensifying.

Client

Department of Defence

Year

2024–25

Deliverable

An award-winning graduate recruitment campaign

Info

But the numbers were not the root cause.

We realised something deeper.

Many talented young people had never considered a career in Defence because they assumed they did not fit. They did not see how their lived experience or their empathy could belong in that environment.

At the same time, candidates who did apply were entering roles without fully connecting to the mission. The program experience was not consistently meeting expectations. Misalignment at entry was becoming attrition months later.

The system was screening for qualifications.

It was not building conviction.

So we shifted the story.

Instead of asking, "Are you qualified enough?" we asked,
"What can only you bring?"

Growth was driven by alignment, not amplification.

The campaign invited people who had previously counted themselves out to see a place for their story.

Within one recruitment cycle

  • 71% increase in total applications

  • 27% increase in applicants identifying as female

  • 233% increase in applicants identifying as gender diverse or non binary

  • 693% increase in LGBTQIA+ candidates

  • 14% increase in CALD applicants

  • 183% increase on Prosple, becoming the most applied to graduate program on the platform

  • 3.81M impressions

How It Changed

We looked upstream at both perception and experience.

This was not a surface level refresh. It was systemic.

Our approach combined:

  • Attendance at 50+ careers fairs across Australia

  • Over 50 stakeholder workshops with past and prospective graduates, program managers, and senior stakeholders

  • Iterative testing of messaging and creative concepts with real audiences

  • Interviews with peak bodies and parallel institutions to understand competitive positioning

Through this depth of engagement, one behavioural truth became clear.

Graduates were choosing employers based on meaning and belonging. The existing narrative centred on structure and eligibility. It unintentionally reinforced the idea that only a certain type of person belonged.

By grounding the brand in purpose and behavioural insight, we reframed so called soft skills as strategic strengths. Empathy. Curiosity. Adaptability. Lived experience.

These were not peripheral qualities. They were mission critical.

We rebuilt website architecture around real candidate questions, reduced friction in the application journey, and aligned promise with program experience to reduce early attrition risk.

This was not a recruitment campaign.

It was a growth system built around identity alignment.

Lasting Impact

The program moved from decline to record interest within a single cycle. More importantly, candidates entered with stronger mission connection and clearer expectations.

The work was later recognised with a MARCOM Award and a MUSE Award. The recognition mattered. The behavioural shift mattered more.

We stopped recruiting for eligibility.

We started building belief.

Credit

Project Lead: Stephanie Dempster
Brand Strategist/Creative Lead: Stephanie Dempster
Strategic Communications Lead: Ella Hourigan
Video and Animation: Liam Stuart and Andrew Gibbon